PROBLEMS OF PROCEDURAL RIGHTS ABUSE

Natalya Zhukova, Irina Kislitsyna, Sergey Mamin, Nail Abbasov, Anastasia Aghajanian

Abstract


Abstract. In this article, the monographic and scientific publications, the practice of unfair realization of rights by the participants of the process are analyzed based on the analysis of certain international legal acts. First of all, we study the legislative consolidation of procedural dishonesty and its consequences, and the impact of presumptions on the identification of procedural dishonesty facts. Based on attribution to investigative and adversary models, specific problems associated with procedural dishonesty are identified, and conclusions about the ways of unfair realization of rights by the participants of the process are formulated.
Key words: process, subjective rights, realization, responsibility, bad faith, abuse.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Advisors I.V. Abuse of law in the electoral process. M .: Chero, 2010. 124 p.

Volkov A.V. Civil Rights Abuse: Problems of Theory and Practice: Monograph. M: Walters Kluver, 2009. 464 p.

Gautrais V. Fictions and presumptions: legal tools of integration of technologies // Legal security and technical security: independence or miscegenation: conference organization International Program of Scientific Cooperation (CRDP / CECOJI). Montreal, 2003.

Herlitz G.N. The Meaning of the Term “Prima Facie” // Louisiana Law Review. 1994. Vol. 55, iss. 2. P. 391-408.

Lowe Jr. E.N. The California Evidence Code: Presumptions // California Law Review. 1965. Vol. 53, iss. 5. P. 1439–1493.

Andrews N. Abuse of Process in English Civil Litigation; Fentiman R. Abuse of Procedural Rights: the Position of English Law / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.

Hazard G. Abuse of Procedural Rights: Regional Report for United States / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.

Taniguchi J. Abuse of Procedural Rights: a Japanese Perspective / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.

Dondi A. Abuse of Procedural Rights: Regional Report for Italy and France / Abuse of Procedural Rights: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness, ed. M. Taruffo. Kulver Law International, 1999.

Sohn L. How American International Lawyers Prepared for the San Francisco Bill of Rights / American Journal of International Law. Volume 89. July 1995. № 3. P. 540-554.

Patrick X. Bout Trade Usages: Article of Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods // www.cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/bout.html

Yudin A.V. Civil proceeding and responsibility: Monograph. St. Petersburg: Law Book, 2009. 624 p.

Taruffo Michele. Abuse of procedural law // Process log. - 2009. - № 177. - p. 187.

Soares K.E. Abuse of procedural law in the new Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure // Herald of the civil process. - 2015. - № 4. - p. 188.

Federal law of March 30, 1998 N 54-ФЗ “On ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its Protocols”.

http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/6AC1A02E-9A3C-4E06-94EF-E0BD377731DA/0/REGLEMENT_EN_Avril2011.pdf

Aleksandr V. Kornyushkin, Marina V. Markhgeym, Alevtina E. Novikova, Fedor F. Chaplickij, Irina S. Chalykh Oath in international law standards // The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC. 2017. April. Special Edition. P. 323-327.

Belyaeva, G. S., Makogon, B. V., Bezugly, S. N., Prokhorova, M. L., & Szpoper, D. (2017). Basic Ideas of State Power Limitation in Political and Legal Doctrine. J. Pol. & L., 10, 197.

Ol'ga, V., Kuksin, I. N., Makogon, B. V., Spektor, L. A., & Vladimirova, O. V. (2018). Restrictive-regulatory potential of procedural standard. Revista Publicando, 5(14), 830-836.

Kuksin, I. N., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., & Tonkov, E. E. (2016). Justice as Principle: Aspects of Genesis in Social and Regulatory Systems. The Social Sciences, 11(10), 2367-2370.

Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Nikonova, L. I., & Stus, N. V. (2018). Constitutional Justice in Circumstances of Public Authority Limits. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 722-728.

Butko, L. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Pozharova, L. A., & Tonkov, E. E. (2017). Personal Dignity in the European Legal Culture. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 296-303.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2226–3209, ІSSN 2409–0506